WAYS TO
AVOID HAVING A SICK BUILDING |
| People can become ill
as a result of the way buildings are constructed and maintained. Recent
investigative newspaper and magazine articles have educated the general
public about the dangers from poor indoor air quality while the legal profession
has put a price tag on such faulty construction, operation and maintenance
of buildings. (1), (2), (3)
As a result, these types of buildings have come to be known as "sick buildings". Investigations, of the reasons why people using these buildings become ill, center on the fact that these buildings have been found to foster mold, viruses and bacteria. When building-related illnesses have been found to occur, the mold experts and trial lawyers move in and multimillion-dollar judgments often result. (4) Five actions can be taken to avoid some of the sick building issues facing today’s professional architects and building owners. Properly implemented, these steps will most likely eliminate the cause of this problem. These actions are as follows: 1. Prevent moisture from entering the building. 2. Control the humidity level in the building and in air conditioning ducts. 3. Avoid hazardous construction materials. 4. Control the sources of material that promote mold, virus and bacteria growth. 5. Provide proper maintenance procedures for building owners and managers.
Moisture is the number one breeding ground for mold, viruses and bacteria. In a colder climate, it is desirable to keep the heat and moisture inside the building during the winter. To do this, the building is insulated and a moisture barrier is placed on the inside of the building. In a warmer climate, it is important to keep the hot humid air outside of the building. A properly placed moisture barrier can help. This moisture barrier needs to be placed at or near the outside of the building. This exterior moisture barrier provides a healthier environment in the building while reducing the operating cost. Recent American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) studies advise avoiding a ventilated attic or a ventilated crawl space. However if these spaces are ventilated then a vapor barrier must be placed in the attic or crawl space. A brick or porous wall requires an air space, a vapor
barrier, and a method to drain any moisture that might accumulate at the
vapor barrier. Synthetic stucco exterior walls are of particular concern
and call for a moisture barrier on the exterior surface or an air space
and a vapor barrier to avoid moisture related problems. In order to control the humidity level in a building,
the mechanical design team A 40 to 60%
humidity level is considered optimum. At this humidity level, the growth
of mold, bacteria and viruses is minimized. (5) |
![]() |
Note:
An adaptation of this chart can be found on page 20.1 of the 2004 ASHRAE
Handbook HVAC Systems and Equipment |
Today, many consulting engineers apply an energy efficient controllable thermosyphon run around heat pipe exchanger as an ideal and reliable way to provide conditioned air during the cooling season. This addition to a typical air handler often reduces the relative humidity of the air supplied to duct to 70% or less while providing the air conditioning system with the capability of maintaining a 40 to 60% relative humidity level in the building without adding additional heat load. Over the life of the building, this approach, while more expensive up front, has proven to be a very attractive low operating cost technique of properly controlling relative humidity levels. |
![]() |
Note:
Shown above is a schematic of how a thermosyphon run around heat pipe
is used in an air conditioning system to passively reduce the energy requirement
while providing free reheat for dehumidification. |
|
Should an engineer design for peak load and ignore the part-load applications, an oversized, inefficient system may result with poor moisture removal at part load. For example, at a 50% part load condition most air conditioning systems on the market today have very limited, if any, moisture removal capability. Because it is necessary to have moisture removal at part-load applications, the controllable thermosyphon heat pipe is an ideal means for the air conditioning system to maintain the necessary level of moisture removal at part-load applications. In addition to considering the need for good moisture removal for part load conditions, the prudent design engineer should insure that the conditioned spaces have positive pressure during hot and humid conditions. Positive pressure is also necessary during other seasons when minimum ventilation is needed. Too low a moisture level can occur in buildings located in regions where the winter design temperature is below 20º F. In these cases the latent load may not be sufficient to maintain a minimum level of 40% humidity. In this situation it may be necessary to add some moisture to attain the targeted relative humidity range of 40 - 60 %.
Common hazardous materials to be avoided are: Any type of paint
that contains lead; asbestos that may be contained in floor tiles, roofing
felt and insulation material; formaldehyde in particleboard; certain glues;
The use of solvents can be a problem due to toxic fumes. Often the use of oil-based paints can be avoided. One preventative measure available is to require prior approval before use of such materials.
A poorly maintained building will often be dirty and serve as a host environment for mold, viruses and bacteria. The air conditioning system, without proper maintenance, often will not be operating efficiently and may not remove moisture from in a building. Upon examination we often find that the building has humidity levels that are excessive.
With existing buildings, the building owners and operators of today are well advised to consider placing their emphasis on these same key elements. Moisture barriers may need to be reviewed to insure that they were correctly placed and properly installed for the buildings’ climate location. Mechanical equipment in many cases needs to be modified to improve its moisture removal capacity. This is especially important if a sensible heat ratio has been changed due to load reductions such as the addition of better insulation or windows or lighting improvements. Such energy savings tend to unbalance the original building cooling design load so that the moisture portion is increased beyond the air conditioning systems capacity. Often it is possible to improve the moisture removal of the mechanical system while improving the building’s energy efficiency Periodic inspection
and evaluation of a building as a healthy environment must continue over
the life of the building. Conclusion Follow these simple actions to avoid having a sick building: • Prevent moisture from entering the building • Control the humidity level in the building and its air conditioning ducts • Avoid the use of hazardous construction materials • Control the sources of material that promote mold, virus and bacteria growth • Provide proper maintenance procedures to building owners and managers
In the final analysis, it is the responsibility of everyone: the building owners, their property managers, and the occupants themselves to maintain or insure the building is a clean and healthy environment. The final result is worth the investment by extending the useful life of the facility while avoiding the risk of having a sick building and the potential associated litigation.
1. “Is your
office killing you?” BusinessWeek June 5, 2000 About the Authors: Mr. Louis N. Drake III was a practicing professional engineer in the air conditioning field since graduating from Georgia Tech. He died in 2004. His professional career included employment as a Naval Officer, Sales Engineer for an air conditioning equipment manufacturer and a Design Engineer at the Charleston Navy yard. He was a founding member of the Charleston Chapter of the American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air Conditioning (ASHRAE). During the period 1980-1995 he was employed as a Staff Engineer and Project Manager at the Veterans Administration (VA) Medical Center, Charleston, S.C. During the period 1996-2003 he served as Vice President of Engineering at Carolina Heat Pipe, Inc. and was responsible for many successful applications. Mr. Richard W. Trent is a graduate engineer who majored in Heat Engineering at SUNY Maritime College and completed graduate refrigeration work at Columbia University (NY). His employment career includes: Chief Engineer of Naval and Merchant Vessels; Manufacturing Engineer and Manufacturing Program Manager for Carrier Air Conditioning Company; and ASHRAE Society Regional Vice Chairman. He is President of Carolina Heat Pipe Inc and holds several U.S. Patents for the Application of Heat Pipe Science to Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Systems.
|